No, they didn’t. The estimate was based on what would have happened with and without the bill. The debt did go up. Revenues didn’t go down because we were in a good economy, but you can’t say how much they would have been without the bill.
This is the most backwards way of economic thinking in the world. Were you in Congress in a prior life?
Revenues going up literally means that the tax cuts could not have added to the debt. This is basic high school math.
Spending and revenue are two separate things.
They should be tied together, but the way are not.
And…… a big part of the CBO estimate was reliant on a drastic increase in interest rates, which never materialized.
And…… and…. the dumbass author brays on about buying “bullets and bombs” but is too stupid to understand that you could zero out the defense budget and still run a deficit.
They appear to have spurred stock buybacks. Demand creates jobs. There’s not much evidence the tax cuts spurred the economy at all. The economy had been humming along fine since about 2009.
That is because we were coming off a giant recession.
I won’t repeat the Trump falsehood that the economy was a disaster when he took it over, but also not as strong as Obama claimed.
There is the “law of diminishing returns”.
“Once the recession is over, the government should switch from expansionary to contractionary fiscal policy because it’s the best time to raise taxes and reduce the deficit and national debt“