That dynamic also helps explain why Vrabel hasn’t faced any on-the-job sanctions yet.
First, he coaches the Patriots, whose owner can’t wag his finger at anybody over shenanigans like the photos in question. Google: Robert Kraft Arrest and you’ll know why.
Second, Vrabel’s not a journalist or Russini’s co-worker. He’s a football coach. Russini’s ethical rulebook says she can’t show unfair bias to people she writes about; coaches can, and do, play media favourites. If he coughs up secrets that could get his team beaten on Sunday, he’d better call a lawyer and negotiate a severance deal. But unless his contract forbids it, he can offer all kinds of inducements in exchange for favourable coverage. And unless their employer approves it, journalists can’t accept.
Also, one point that the ESPN article that I linked to plus other articles makes is that Russini immediately contacted a crisis management company to handle this and that she and Vrabel coordinated on how to respond to those photos. That alone is a big indicator they both knew this wasn’t just some innocent thing. Add to that, as part of its investigation The Athletic asked Russini to provide proof of her story that she was on a hiking trip with friends and she could not show anything. And, if it really was some innocent thing like Russini said, wouldn’t there be a lot of people immediately stepping up to verify their story?
Bottom-line: Russini did something really stupid for somebody in her profession and is paying for it big-time.
If you don’t see the conflict of interest in a reporter having a non-professional relationship with a person who she covers as part of her job, I don’t know what else to say.
I will just reiterate my point that a journalist covering somebody with whom she has a relationship screams conflict of interest big-time. And, that applies to “he” journalists too, just so nobody accuses me of being sexist.