He want to keep Section 230, but also points out that wikipedia is entirely user modorated, not controlled by some overbearing “moderators”.
He also calls for financial transparency and algorithm transparency, which I am sure big tech will fight against even harder than the do to keep Section 230.
The users are the overbearing moderator.
True, but it usually evens itself out in the end.
No, there have been news stories on that. A few people can control anyone edits and they always make sure their edits are the ‘truth’.
Yes, concur. This asshole Wales is just lying his ass off. Wikipedia has its own arcane system of Truth Ministry.
For fun I thought I would edit some articles. All my edits were rejected and put back in my someone with more ‘status’ this giving them more status.
This topic was automatically closed 3 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.