This faux tough talk is causing my eyes to roll.
Rahm and DeChambeau can easily come back on tour due to their popularity.
If the other players don’t like that, or them, or aren’t happy with their decisions, I doubt either of them gives a shit. They’ll play and live their lives, and nobody will really be thinking about all this LIV stuff in a couple years.
Not sure what this PGA whore of an author thinks constitutes the “FO” here.
Exactly, worst case scenario they play in a couple of late season tournaments and get exemptions for the following year. Just the same as any rookie would have to do.
Don’t assume we all know what those acronym’s mean. FAFO? FA? FO?
If you keep it up I’ll write a long post with aviation acronyms!
I’ve had more time to digest some of this LIV drama, and I’m now feeling a lot less judgmental towards the players that joined it.
The PGA is essentially a monopoly, and competition is a good thing, even if the competitors do not always catch on for the long haul.
A lot of the opinions about this whole situation, even including my recent ones, reek of smugness from people who seem to think that all golfers owe some kind of fealty to the PGA. For no apparent reason at all, other than that it is the status quo monopoly.
I think all these dudes, and everybody else, have the right to move on from situations and relationships as they desire. If such a decision turns out to be a mistake, then that’s life. People make mistakes.
And often people move on for the better.
F around, find out.
I didn’t know what that meant also.